Multilingual Educators for Deaf Learners
The World Federation of the Deaf (WFD), a leading global organisation dedicated to championing the rights of deaf individuals, is a staunch advocate for the implementation of Article 24 of the CRPD. This pivotal Article mandates that deaf learners should be educated in environments that are both linguistically and culturally appropriate, such as quality inclusive multilingual settings alongside other deaf peers. The WFD, with its extensive experience and expertise in deaf education, is a key player in promoting these inclusive policies. This is an excerpt from the WFD’s official website.
Mm,
When we examine the Education Sectors around the world, we see a clear need for every school, college, Polytechnic, and University to include sign language in their curriculum. This action is not just about allowing students to choose their language subject in the classroom or lecture. It’s about creating a multilingual and culturally appropriate environment that benefits all students. Sign language, as a tool for inclusion and equality, has the potential to foster a sense of belonging among all students, offering an optimistic future.
However, the stark reality is that a single Deaf child in a mainstream school often finds themselves isolated and unable to communicate in sign language. In contrast, other children converse freely in the classroom and on the playground. This method is a clear indication of the scarcity of resources in our education system. The chronic lack of funding for teacher aides with sign language skills, school equipment like Zoom, and limited hours, for instance, only two days a week with a teacher aide, is not just a call to action, but an urgent one. We must address these resource gaps immediately to ensure a truly inclusive education system.
For example, the Hamilton Deaf Units were linked to Kelston School for the Deaf (later renamed Kelston Deaf Education Centre in Auckland). The first Deaf Education was established at the Sumner School for the Deaf, Christchurch; however, it was strictly taught in the oral method, according to the Ministry of Education and the result of the ban on sign language banned by the Milan Congress (1880), a significant event in the history of deaf education that led to the suppression of sign language and the promotion of oralism, stressing the importance of understanding the past for a better future.
The Education Policies in the countries are often ambiguous and lack clear guidelines when it comes to Teachers of D/deaf children and D/deaf children with disabilities, university-qualified teacher aides for D/deaf children and D/deaf children with disabilities, funding allocation each year, and the role/skills of professional interpreters through activities and recreation. This lack of clarity and comprehensiveness in the policies is a significant barrier to the practical education of deaf learners.
Have you heard about language deprivation before going to school lately? Did you know that any D/deaf baby can pick up sign language/pictures quickly than spoken language from 12 weeks old? The answer is Yes. It is crucial to begin teaching sign language at an early stage, coinciding with the baby’s cognitive development, as it serves as a visual aid for individuals with word blindness. In this condition, a person has difficulty understanding written or spoken words. Sign language can provide a visual representation of language, making it more accessible for individuals with this condition.
The Deaf child/ren will have the choice to use both sign language and spoken language when they are older and blend into the Deaf community as part of D/deaf culture.
Every Ministry of Education should follow Article 24 of the CRPD, United Nations Convention on the Human Rights of People with Disabilities, clearly, not under their own Member of Parliament and staff.
Life in Eureka 